Sunday, September 27, 2015

Self-Discovery: there is a test for that!

George W. Bush.  Paul the ApostleBoromir.  Dana Scully.  What do they all have in common?  Supposedly they are all Myers-Briggs ESTJ (Extravert, Sensing, Thinking, Judging) personality
types: strong willed, organizers, guardians, creators of order, and reliable.  How they got Boromir or Scully to take the test is beyond me.  ESTJs are also apparently stubborn, judgmental, struggle with unconventional solutions, and have difficulty relaxing.  I am an ESTJ personality type though I am a borderline Intravert/Extravert.  I'll admit to most of the above (except I am also lovable).

I have been assessed and tested lots over the years as various tools rolled through my workplaces.  Sometimes useful for understanding workplace dynamics, others examined my teaching, learning, or leadership styles.

Another sort of assessment explores your gifts and strengths.  I have used assessments like these in churches to help people explore volunteer opportunities.  These assessments tend to be of two types: spiritual gifts or natural talents.  The first looks at the talents and gifts described in the Bible.  The New Testament Letter to the Romans, for example, lists seven gifts/talents to serve the church: prophesying, serving, teaching, encouraging, giving, leading, and showing mercy.

3 Colors of Ministry One of these skill tests was The 3 Colors of Ministry that uses 180 questions to rank 34 different gifts/talents.  When I took that test my strengths were: teaching, wisdom (!), missions, discernment, and pastoring. The tests provided definitions and descriptions of each of these gifts, as well as blind spots and tips for developing the gifts.  Teachers in the church could lead a small group Bible study (as I do) or teach classes and seminars. Teacher types are warned that they must be careful to live what they teach, take the time to prepare effectively, and continue to be a learner.

Living your strengthsThe other type of test considers natural talents and abilities discovered through extensive surveys and testing.  These aren't particularly religious but can be applied to a religious context like a church.

Living Your Strengths by Winseman and Clifton is one of these. Built on the Gallup Clifton Strengths Finder research, these tests are used in companies to build work teams. The test is built on the premise that we are often too focused on our weaknesses when we should be building on our strengths.  I ran across this test in a local church that uses it to help people find where they can serve best in their church.

I took the test and discovered my strengths were, in order: (drum roll...) Analytical, Input, Learner, Belief, and Responsibility.  Different categories from the 3 Colors test but with conceptual overlap. In a nutshell (!), I question and investigate because I need to know, I collect information, and I love to learn.  Winseman and Clifton suggest that people with these strengths don't like contradictions, or "wishful" or "clumsy thinking." However if not careful can be harsh in their critique.  They can collect far too much information.  They have a belief system that includes strong ethics, and a need to take personal responsibility ("my good name depends on it.") Their work must mesh with their values and must be meaningful.  Oh, and they probably over commit. Boy, that does sound a lot like me. Kind of creepy when these tests are accurate.

There are lots of tests out there; some better than others.  Though these are useful to develop self-understanding, I've often found the best test to determine your strengths and weaknesses is a group of wise friends who know you well enough to tell you what they see, and to whom you will listen. Churches, when they work well, are good places for that.

Friday, May 15, 2015

Info Tech Goes to Church (and Something Changes)

Churches have had a long history of adopting new media to communicate their message whether it was plays, the printing press, or contemporary film.  New technology offers resources that impact preaching by integrating multimedia in worship, expanding outreach through streaming services and podcasts, and providing live feedback through tools such as Twitter/chat.  The life of religious communities is also impacted by new communication technologies that blur the boundaries of local and remote participation and challenge traditional ideas of koinonia (fellowship).

This year's annual conference at the Center for the Study of Information and Religion at Kent State University (June 5, 2015) will explore the impact of new tech on religious organizations.  I will be speaking about the potential legal, ethical, and theological implications of the tech we bring into the church.  Join our conversation; this is a whole new world to explore!


Friday, May 8, 2015

Roaming bands of Librarians invade Moncton...

Doesn't strike terror in the heart does it? There really was a band but it was a ukulele jam.  For five days the Canadian Association of Law Librarians met in warm and sunny (!!!) Moncton, NB for their annual conference.  You can get a flavour of the conference by following the tweet stream from the conference. Great to see old friends and make new ones, and we will all remember the closing reception at Parlee beach when the power went out!

I wanted to share a few of my favourite moments from the conference:

Fred Headon, Chair of the CBA’s Legal Futures Initiative, was our first keynote and raised questions about the direction of the legal profession.  He drew on his experience as In-House Counsel with Air Canada (we learned lots about pilots and airline processes, and a few things about dentists) to ask how the profession can innovate to place the client at the centre of service delivery.  Relevant question for librarians as I often feel our innovations still have us at the centre. Favourite Quotes (via @conniecrosby): "Law today looks a lot like his grandfather's law practice in Moosejaw - unlike other industries that have changed", (via @smireau) "There is not much sacred about how we do our jobs."

Jen Adams and Jon Shapiro (and Mark Lewis in spirit) deserve mention for their presentation on using online student engagement platforms in the classrooms to transform mundane content to an interactive experience.  They demonstrated that the tech use was rooted in their pedagogy and more than a cool trend.  The use of technologies like this in their flipped classroom experiment is cutting edge and it is important we share these innovations. Favourite quote: "Just ask my students, I'm like this all the time."

Annette Demers breakout session on "Beyond Bureaucracy: Building a User Centred Library from the Ground Up" was inspired by her own frustrating library experiences.  Indignation is usually the root of revolution.  She spoke about transforming services from top down bureaucracies to client centred where we ask "how can we make this happen?" I loved her enthusiasm and passion! Favourite quotes: "we are soft-shelled organisms on a ball of burning rock hurtling through space. Change is likely," "My job as a leader is to resource you," and "bureaucracy, patriarchy and micromanagement stifle employee engagement and initiative."

Surprisingly, Law Prof. Wayne MacKay's presentation "Effectively Responding to Cyberbullying: There's No App for That" struck a nerve for me.  I say surprisingly, as Wayne and I work in the same faculty and I have heard his presentation before.  He questions how it is that someone could bully another in this way so cruelly "just for fun."  I think we have created digital "Lords of the Flies" islands where immature people are left to govern themselves and then we are surprised by the results.  There were lots of solutions suggested like restricting access to the Internet and better parental tech training, but it struck me that with the speed technology changes we will never be ahead of the curve.  I wondered if we need to be teaching ethics rather than tech to parents, teachers, and students.  Here is where my personal beliefs are reflected: in our increasingly ego-centric and self-gratifying world, we all need to be reminded that we are each made in the image of God, by virtue of that, each of infinite value, and how we treat those around us will have eternal consequences for good and for evil.

Lots more sessions, and I can't describe them all. It was a good conference, I learned a lot, and they fed me well (far, far too well).

Photo Credit: JoshJRobbins, P1010511 cc licence.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Oh to be the library's Alvin Toffler!

What is the future of library reference services? 

On March 5, 2015 I had the privilege to speak on that topic with the students of the Nova Scotia Community College Library Technician program.  I've taught students in the Master of Library and Information Science program, but this is the first time speaking with this group.  They are a wonderful group of students, and they are keen to understand where their profession is heading.  The invitation came as a response to my request on the APLA listserv for innovative research support service examples.  I was curious what cool things were going on and so were these students.

It was surprised by how few innovations were forthcoming.  If libraries are transforming themselves why are the changes so modest and...well frankly uninspiring?

I shared three examples of significant innovations that got my attention, both high and low tech:

1. University of Melbourne Law Research Service and Legal Academic Skills Center.
The first service provides dedicated research staff to support faculty research.  The second is a confluence of services designed to build student research skills including classes, workshops, and student wellness programs.  (Yes, we do most of these things already but what we don't do is integrate them with dedicated staff at this level of commitment.)

2. Simon Fraser University, Research Commons.  Going the next step, SFU has used the idea of the research lifecycle to guide their integration of services to students and faculty.  From creating the spaces and opportunities for idea creation, fostering collaborative partnerships, developing proposals and grants, facilitating research (traditional library stuff), to the publishing role (an emerging library role.)  One place to support the whole research endeavour.

3. Hold onto your seats: The Hunt Library, University of North Carolina.  This is a showcase of technological and social experimentation for libraries.  With immersive labs, and new private, semi-private, and collaborative work spaces, this library is breathing new life into the library as third space. (Watch the video.)

Three different focuses, three innovative visions of the role of the library as the locus of research.  The students and I discussed the implications of implementing these ideas, and the small steps we had taken to implement pieces into our own practice.  In the face of gloomy prophecies of the death of libraries, there are rays of hope for the next generation of information workers.

I wish I could see into the future.  A lot of the speculative fiction out there doesn't paint a very encouraging image of the future reference librarian.  I think of the holographic librarian interface from the 2002 remake of the Time Machine.  Reference is reduced to merely an interactive AI interface to the database of knowledge.  I think there are possibilities out there for really interesting services that are more than a better digital interface.  To borrow a quote from the futurist Alvin Toffler, "Society needs all kinds of skills that are not just cognitive; they’re emotional, they’re affectional. You can’t run the society on data and computers alone." 

Thanks for the invitation, NSCC! I hope you enjoyed our time as much as I did.

Powered by Blogger